Library

 

Jesus

 

Bible

 

Church  Authority

 

Mary

 

Moral  Issues

 

Pro-Life

 

Sacraments

 

Saints

 

Misc.

 

 

 

    

 

DEFENDING  THE  BRIDE

 

 

π  Day

We have good reason to celebrate π Day, March 14.  
Or Stardate 3.14.16

Pi Day points the beauty of God’s creation.

We live in a universe of physical laws, or constants that govern creation.  What if these constants were to change from one day to the next ?  Our world would just be random choas.  Why does our world even have laws or constants to begin with ?  They point to a Divine Law Giver.

 If these constants had values of even a very small difference, some being of only 1 or 2 percentage points different, physical life could not exist.

 

 

 
The Case for a Divine Law Giver
:

from
Robert J. Spitzer, S.J. Ph.D' web site

The high improbability of five other anthropic conditions (based on cosmological constants)

A cosmological constant is a number which controls the equations of physics, and the equations of physics, in turn, describe the laws of nature. Therefore, these numbers control the laws of nature (and whether these laws of nature will be hospitable or hostile to any life form). ...

1
 If the gravitational constant (G) or weak force constant (gw) varied from their values by an exceedingly small fraction (higher or lower) -- one part in 10^50 (.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001)
then either the universe would have suffered a catastrophic collapse or would have exploded throughout its expansion, both of which options would have prevented the emergence and development of any life form. This cannot be reasonably explained by pure chance.

2
 If the strong nuclear force constant were higher than its value (15) by only 2%, there would be no hydrogen in the universe (and therefore no nuclear fuel or water -- this would have prohibited life). If, on the other hand, the strong nuclear force constant had been 2% lower than its value then no element heavier than hydrogen could have emerged in the universe (helium, carbon, etc). This would have been equally detrimental to the development of life. This “anthropic coincidence” also seems to lie beyond the boundaries of pure chance.

3
 If the gravitational constant, electromagnetism, or the “proton mass relative to the electron mass” varied from their values by only a tiny fraction (higher or lower), then all stars would be either blue giants or red dwarfs. These kinds of stars would not emit the proper kind of heat and light for a long enough period to allow for the emergence, development, and complexification of life forms. Again, these “anthropic coincidences” are beyond pure chance occurrence.

4
 If the weak force constant had been slightly smaller or larger than its value, then supernovae explosions would never have occurred. If these explosions had not occurred, there would be no carbon, iron, or earth-like planets.

5
 Fred Hoyle and William Fowler discovered the exceedingly high improbability of oxygen, carbon, helium and beryllium having the precise values to allow for both carbon abundance and carbon bonding (necessary for life). This “anthropic coincidence” was so striking that it caused Hoyle to abandon his previous atheism and declare:

“A common sense interpretation of the facts suggests that a superintellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as with chemistry and biology, and that there are no blind forces worth speaking about in nature. The numbers one calculates from the facts seem to me so overwhelming as to put this conclusion almost beyond question.”
Footnote 1.

 

The high improbability that chance alone could explain our universe having anthropic conditions, that is, natural physical laws being just right such that life is possible (because of the cosmological constants being precisely as they are) points to the reality that there must be Divine Law Giver.


Article: Anthropic Coincidences

Video: The Anthropic Principle (1 of 4): by Dr. Robert Spitzer  

Big Bang -
Proof that there had to be a beginning.

New Proofs for the Existence of God. 

Father Spitzer: You-Tube : Response to Stephen Hawkin's argument that Gravity brought world into existence,

the antidote to Stephen Hawking's faulty logic
 
How Contemporary Physics Points to God
by Fr. Robert Spitzer

So, celebrate Stardate

3.14.16

Read more at

God lays the foundation for science through the Catholic Church

 
 
 
Footnote 1.

Text taken from
Robert J. Spitzer, S.J. Ph.D' web site

 
 

Foundation For Science

 
 
 

NEW   Cool  Catholic  Graphics


See  Articles  at

JESUS     BIBLE     CHURCH   AUTHORITY

  MARY     MORAL  ISSUES     PRO-LIFE

  SACRAMENTS       SAINTS       MISC.


HOME  - DEFENDING  THE  BRIDE

www.DefendingTheBride.com


 

 

 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

Some examples of constants are:

the speed of light constant (c= 300,000 km per second),

Planck’s constant (ℏ = 6.6 x 10-34 joule seconds),

the gravitational attraction constant (G = 6.67 x 10-11 ),

the strong nuclear force constant (gs = 15),

the weak force constant (gw = 1.43 x 10-62),

the mass of the proton (mp = 1.67 x 10-27 kg),

rest mass of an electron (me = 9.11 x 10-31 kg),

and charge of an electron proton (e = 1.6 x 10-19 coulombs).

There are several other constants, but these pertain to the following anthropic coincidences (highly improbable conditions required for life).

See More Physical Constants