| For example, notice what is called the Niche of the 
		Pillia above. It is located in what is now the basement area of St. 
		Peter’s Basilica underneath the main or High Altar. Look closely at the 
		Icon of Jesus Christ and the grill above it.  Why is it so lopsided?  Or 
		is it lopsided?  And why is the cross to the left upside down? You will 
		have to read the book to get the answer to this and so many other 
		questions. Protestants will often claim that the bones found 
		under St. Peter’s were not his, but that of a woman. So, what is the 
		whole story ? The Holy Father realized that the validity of the 
		Catholic faith would not rise or fall with this legend proven either 
		way.  So, prudently he instructed all concerned not to make any assertions 
		until the excavations had been completed and all the data 
		had been thoroughly analyzed in a professional way.  Contrary to his wishes an 
		enterprising Italian journalist presumptuously reported that some bones 
		found near St. Peter’s grave were indeed his.  And the New York 
		Times on August 22, 1949 ran a headline on page one stating that Peter’s 
		bones had been found.  However, these were not St. Peter’s.  What had 
		been found were bones belonging to a woman and two men, neither of whom 
		were St. Peter.  So, some Protestants focus exclusively on this 
		blunder. Actually St. Peter’s grave turned out to be empty 
		of bones except for that of a mouse.  And most interestingly that mouse 
		had a role in confirming the other data which provides an overabundant 
		proof of the identity of St. Peter’s bones.  Not wanting to spoil 
		the story, I will save the details for what will be a joyful experience 
		in your reading the book. One of the important details in the proof of 
		the identity of the bones is the location of Saint Peter’s Basilica.  
		It was built on 
		the side of a large hill.  From an architectural 
		 point of view this is the worst possible place to build such a large building.  
		The section below from the book gives you a hint as why this location 
		had to be as it is. 
 Chapter  12  “The Ancient Silence 
		 If the critics were right, if 
		it was not Constantine who had Peter’s bones removed from the central 
		grave, wrapped in purple cloth, and …(sorry, this detail is omitted.  It 
		is best read in context of the book.  I don’t want to ruin the fun of 
		reading it.)    the one thing is clear: the 
		transfer must have taken place before the Emperor’s dramatic arrival on 
		the scene. But who, in that case, did order the removal? And when was it 
		done and for what possible reason? Instinct whispers that the answers to 
		those tantalizing questions may well provide the key to much that is 
		still, more than a dozen years after Pope Paul’s announcement, at odds 
		in the history of the relics. Doubts about the grateful 
		Emperor having arranged the transfer are not only legitimate, they are 
		inescapable. The enormous physical effort that was expended in erecting 
		the original basilica - oriented over one exact spot upon ruggedly 
		uneven terrain - was necessary precisely because the intended focal 
		point, the bones, could not be moved. This unarguable fact leaves no 
		room at all for the claim that, just prior to the start of work on the 
		basilica, the focal point was moved. Nor has a convincing reply been 
		made to those critics who instinctively shake their heads in stubborn 
		disbelief ...” 
 Saint Jerome writes the following about St. Peter’s 
		death “Simon Peter, the son of John, from the village of 
		Bethsaida in the province of Galilee, brother of Andrew the apostle, and 
		himself chief of the apostles, after having been bishop of the church of 
		Antioch and having preached to the Dispersion . . . pushed on to Rome in 
		the second year of Claudius to over-throw Simon Magus, and held the 
		sacerdotal chair there for twenty-five years until the last, that is the 
		fourteenth, year of Nero. At his hands he received the crown of 
		martyrdom being nailed to the cross with his head towards the ground and 
		his feet raised on high, asserting that he was unworthy to be crucified 
		in the same manner as his Lord”      (Lives of Illustrious Men 1 A.D. 
		396). When St. Peter’s bones where found this fact was 
		further attested to by the fact that although they found bones from 
		every other part of his body, even some of his finger bones, none of the 
		bones where found from his feet.  This suggests that his feet were 
		separated from his body.  And this would have been the easiest way to 
		take down a body that was attached to a cross upside down, that is by 
		chopping off the feet. Because the author relates the information as it 
		was chronologically revealed, you will find yourself anxiously awaiting 
		the newly discovered facts that come with the turning of each page.  
		You can read the full contents of this book, complete with pictures and 
		illustrations. 
		
		The Bones of St. Peterby 
		John Evangelist Walsh, © 1982, 2011.
   
		
		Does the church possess the actual bones of St. Peter?  
		Fr. Saunders responds. Also see  
		Relics See
		
		Virtual Tour  of the Necropolis including St. Peter's grave at 
		Vatican website 
		
		Video, 2 hour presentation on the building of St. Peter's in Italian 
		LanguageMore articles on  
		Saint 
		Peter |